Ethical Perspectives Essay

ABSTRACTThis paper forget describe the cardinal different types of respectable eyeshots. We will start by describing my honorable perspective which I found out to be character from my results on the honourable Aw arness Inventory Assessment. We will then evaluate the four types of honorable perspectives. Which overwhelm character/ righteousness, pledge/deontology, results/ usefulism, and lastly, equity/relativism. Then we will solve with a brief discussion on issues superstar is likely to clang dealing with h one(a)st dilemmas at Bank of America.The four ethical perspectives include character/virtue, obligation/deontology, results/utilitarianism, and equity/relativism thus, making up CORE. These different ethical perspectives help to explain what drives an individuals decision when faced with an ethical dilemma. It is easy for someone to say what they will do when faced with an cause of an ethical dilemma however, it is another thing to pull in that same decision when f aced with an actual real- lifetime dilemma. By understanding what perspective compels someone to make an ethical decision, it will be easier to make that decision when one sincerely has to.I have found that my ethical perspective is character/virtue. I was not surprised when I got my results. I have unendingly through with(p) my best to go away a life of integrity, which is very important to me. The concourse in my life would agree. Character is a very, if not the most, important map of a persons make up. Without character you have no solid or clear foundation. Without character you most likely with not possess fast moralistics natur altogethery. Character is the beginning building block of a undefeated and trustworthy person who is dependable and values integrity.Character/VirtueThe properties of a virtue are very different from that of other moral concepts, much(prenominal) as value. Virtues are something that you possess only if you practice them. Values are what is imp ortant to flock. I may value honesty, but not ceaselessly tell the rectitude. I cannot possess the virtue of honesty without telling the truth (Ciulla, 2004). Aristotle once said, Virtues are good habits that we l create from society and our leaders. People must(prenominal) practice virtues while being fully conscious that what they are doingis virtuously right. One thing about the Greek concept of virtue (aret), which is in any case means uprightness, is that it does not separate an individuals ethics from ones occupational ability. Both Plato and Aristotle used many examples of doctors, musicians, coaches, rulers, etc. to splatter about the relationship between moral and professional excellence. Aristotle wrote, Every excellence brings to good the thing to which it is the excellence and makes the work of that thing be make well. . . . Therefore, if this is legitimate in all(prenominal) case, the excellence of man also will be the state which makes man good and which mak es him do his work well. (Ciulla, 2004) pledge/DeontologyDeontological ethics or deontology, which means obligation or duty in Greek, is an approach to ethics that focuses on the right or wrong of fills themselves, as opposed to the consequences of those actions. It is sometimes described as duty or obligation based ethics, because deontologists believe that ethical rules bind you to your duty. Deontological ethics is commonly contrasted with consequentiality or teleological ethical theories, according to which the rightness of an action is unflinching by its consequences. Deontologists, such as W. D. Ross, hold that the consequences of an action, such as lying, may make lying the right thing to do (Ross, 2002). Many mass feel obligated to do what is right just because of their ethical practices. I feel that no matter what, you should be ethical in everything that you do.Results/UtilitarianismUtilitarianism is the base that the moral worth of an action is solely determined by i ts portion to overall utility, that is, its contribution to happiness or pleasure as summed among all persons. It is therefore a form of consequentialism, meaning that the moral worth of an action is determined by its outcome. Utility has been defined by various people as happiness or pleasure, though preference utilitarians, define it as the satisfaction of preferences. It may be described as a life stance with happiness or pleasure as ultimate immenseness (Wikipedia 2008).Utilitarianism can be contrasted with deontological ethics (which disregards the consequences of performing an act, when determining its moral worth) and virtue ethics (which focuses on character), as well as with other varieties of consequentialism. Supporters of these debate views have extensivelycriticized the utilitarian view though utilitarians have been in like manner critical of other types of ethical perspective. In general, use of the term utilitarian often refers to a somewhat narrow economic or ha rdheaded viewpoint (Broad, 1930).Equity/RelativismIn philosophy, moral relativism is the position that moral or ethical propositions do not reflect objective and/or everyday moral truths, but instead make claims relative to social, cultural, historical, or in the flesh(predicate)ised circumstances. Moral relativists hold that no universal standard exists by which to valuate an ethical propositions truth moral subjectivism is therefore the opposer of moral absolutism. Relativistic positions often see moral values as applicable only within certain cultural boundaries (cultural relativism), or in the context of individual preferences (moral subjectivism). An extreme relativist position might suggest that sagaciousness the moral or ethical judgments or acts of another person or group has no meaning. Though, most relativists advocate a more trammel version of the theory. In moral relativism, there are no sacrosanct rights and wrongs, only different situations (Wikipedia 2008).Som e moral relativists hold that a personal and subjective moral core lies at the base of individuals moral acts. In this view, public morality reflects social convention, and only personal, subjective morality expresses true authenticity. Moral relativism differs from moral pluralism, which acknowledges the co-existence of opposing ideas and practices but accepts limits to differences, such as when rattling human needs are violated. Moral relativism, in contrast, grants the possibility of moral judgments that do not accept such limits (Wikipedia 2008).Working in a banking environment, I believe having the ethical perspective of character is very important. by nature having a moral and ethical character places trustingness and trust in my superiors that I will do what is ethically right in every situation. I do not see many issues arising in my administration because Bank of America places our Code of Ethics as a precession that each associate must abide by. Understanding characte r, we see that ethical decisions are made naturally because it is right. I do my best to preserve Bank of Americas code in everything I do.In shoemakers last, there are many differences to the types of ethical perspectives with few related qualities. Individuals from diverse walks of life and belief systems come to their own ethical perspective conclusion in many different ways. My personal ethics perspective is character. I believe having good character is a vital part of ones life. It will not only lead to success, but earn peoples respect along the way. The admiration of others, and the trust and confidence they will feel from one that has great character is priceless. My father has always taught me that you can never be wrong doing the right thing. I live my life by this and encourage others to as well.ReferencesBroad, C. (1930). Five types of ethical theory. revolutionary York Harcourt, Brace and Co.Ciulla, J. (2004). Ethics, the heart of leadership. Connecticut Praeger.Ross , W. D. (2002). The right and the good. Oxford Clarendon Press.Wikipedia. (2008). Retrieved September 17, 2008 from http//www.wikipedia.org