Development of the American Experience, Thomas Jefferson

This passage is found on page 136, left column, quartern paragraph. This passage is theatrical roled by Thomas Jefferson to argue on the need of designateing a authorities to replace the old structure of g everywherenance erected and hold by the British cr stimulate. The passage establishes the basis for the dissolution of the American lots political bands(Jefferson 136) and affiliation with Great Britain by stating that although changes in the presidency should never be taken lightly, it is unfortunate that many people atomic number 18 likely to prefer and even tolerate the wrongdoings and evil deeds promoted in the existing system for the sake of familiarity.In cosmopolitan, people are afraid of the respite brought about by systemic changes because they are afraid of uncertainty. However, they spend a penny to gain ground that it is their right to initiate changes in terms of giving medication when there is lavish reason to do so, much(prenominal) as wanton abuse of military force of leaders or corrupt practices or whenever any form of regime becomes destructive or poses a hindrance to the achievement of kind being rights to vivification, liberty, and the inte confront group of happiness. (Jefferson 136)Jefferson observes that the prevailing conditions under the governance of the present king of Great Britain points to such circumstance of injuries and usurpations (Jefferson 137) which have severely impeded the political and brotherly life of the American people. Clearly, Jefferson uses this line of argument to convince the people of the morality of self-governance and of declaring freedom vis-a-vis the state of being enslaved and virtually dependent on the British for political, social, and economic sustenance.By acknowledging the doubts and difficulties that surround the decision to break the ties with the long time British ruler, Jefferson and his followers wanted to arouse a sense of righteous fretfulness in the face of the histo rical abuses committed by the king and his government. For instance, he reminds his audience of how the British king has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our t stimulates, & destroyed the lives of our people. (138)In effect, Jefferson encourages his audience to rise up against the tyrannical form of government enforce by a foreign ruler through and through the systematic use of violence and violation of human rights. In bringing up the general hesitance of the populace, Jefferson mocks and prods them into recognizing the validity of separation and of establishing their own government as a last resort in the face of the continued refusal of the British king to petitions for redress.(139)It is evident from Jeffersons The Declaration of Independence that the need to form an case-by-case government is make inevitable in order to protect the inbred rights of the American people from another government which is exploitative and tyrannical. Undoubtedly, it is through this apprehension of tyranny in governance that societies are able to form their own distinct ideas of what a government or the state of social transaction should be like.Thomas Jefferson would later expound on the meaning of tyranny through religious bigotry and intolerance when he proposes the passage of an act to establish religious freedom as a human right. (141) The necessity of enacting canon to prevent religious tyranny, which presupposes the superiority of a single religion over others and promotes the propagation of religion through coercion and imposition of religious ideas and opinions over others, shows that the government functions as a regulatory mechanism for guaranteeing human rights, including ensuring that whizs human right does not deprive another of his or her rights.Thomas Paine argues, for instance, thatgovernment, even in its best state, is a necessary evil (133) to pose that government solitary(prenominal) becomes a social necessity when the members of societ y have become too corrupted and too selfish so that they must(prenominal) be forced to acknowledge and perform their obligations toward others in order to encounter peace and security, or when the people consider misery because of the intrusion of the government of another people.In many ways, both Jefferson and Paines conception of the role and relevance of the government as a social institution bears resemblance to the concepts explored by Rosseau in his thesis on the Social Contract, wherein he traces the historical grow of the birth of societies and governments, and describes the ideal relationship between the government and the people or the sovereign. Like Rosseau, Jefferson and Paine condemns the impulse towards tyranny that promotes the clash between the minority and bulk interest, as represented by the tendency of the few to promote their selfish interests at the expense of others.This is exemplified in Jefferson and Paines account of the American experience under Brit ish rule, wherein both authors find the American people to the full justified in announcing separation and in establishing a government of our own as our natural right. (Paine 135) Rosseaus influence on the conception of nationalism on American thinkers such as Jefferson and Paine is also evident in the concepts of territory and the boundaries of private and social property that the authors use to justify the strain to revolt against British colonization.This is clearly stipulated in the reasons that Jefferson and Paine enumerates, wherein they invoke the inherent human right to self-determination. (Ibid) Indeed, Jeffersons argument on the right of the people to depart or to abolish a government based on its softness to protect the rights of the citizens and when it becomes an impediment towards the realization of full human development was made at a time when people lacked the confidence to believe that they were suitable of governing themselves.However, Jeffersons concept o f the right of the people to a government that fully reflects and represents their collective interests and aspirations continues to resound to this day, when new forms of tyranny and new forms of conquest persists, oftentimes under the cloak of democracy or for the pursuit of human security.It is not a stretch of the mind to note the persistence of social problems such as intolerance and discrimination based on religion, gender, or social status, or the continued poverty experienced not only by the American people more so by the rest of the world, that effectively prevents the full realization of human rights and potentials that Jefferson and Paine have so boldly championed, and on which the democratic ideals of American society were built on.