Gay Marriage Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Gay wedding party - Essay Example5). Using the example of Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer, a gay couple on who had been together for over forty years, yet when Thea died, Edith was left with taxes that she would not have received had she married a man. This couple stands as the perfect example of how mis do by same-sex couples are, prompting the self-governing Court to hear their pleas for equality. The member comes to an end with a rundown of the various complications that may come as a result of the Supreme Court making a ruling on gay marriage, and the fact that the Supreme Court is moderate in its power when it comes to state law. Mark Sherman and Dennis Juniuss article, Obama Considers Weighing In on Gay Marriage Case looks at the Obama administrations decision to urge the Supreme Court to overturn atomic number 20s ban on gay marriage. President Obama made his stance clear since his first spring address that he support gay marriage and felt that gay couples should not be tr eated differently under the law. President Obama stated that his administration would do whatever it could to promote that principle (Sherman & Junius par. 8). However, these beliefs were originally personal, and Obama set little in motion for taking the issue to a legal level. Sherman and Junius also dapple out the many an(prenominal) limitations that the Supreme Court has in making a ruling, as well as the other options that proponents of gay marriage have. The primary similarity between these both separate articles is that they focus on the ongoing battle to legalize gay marriage and allow same-sex couples to make use of the same rights that straight couples receive upon marriage. Homosexuality has been a taboo topic up until a decade ago, and it continues to become much known, and the argument strengthened, as proponents speak up for the rights they believe that everyone deserves, regardless of who they love. In Bravins article, we see the locomote that have been taken by the gay community and those that support the gay community to get their voices perceive by powers that have the abilities to overturn bans against gay marriage. In Sherman and Juniuss article, the debate has moved beyond what is pass judgment of the Supreme Court and, instead, looks to how our current president can help the cause. The deuce articles both provide undercoat and methods as to what is currently taking place in this fight for equality. Another startling similarity is how the two articles focus mainly on the proponents for gay marriage and spend very little time facial expression at those that are opposed to accepting same-sex couples as legally married. While bias is not of necessity present in either article, all of the authors seem more concerned with a positive portion for same-sex couples and gay marriage supporters. This concern is seen in how the authors, along with providing background into the debates, also offer up extra routes that same-sex couples can t ake depending on the ruling of the Supreme Court. As a result, it becomes clear that same-sex couples have many avenues to continue their fight, though there seems to be a collective hope that the Supreme Court impart find sympathy with those that desire equality with their partners. A major difference found between the two articles is that the perception on the debate of same-sex marriage shifts from a select few homosexual couples and the Supreme Court, in Bravins article, to a much larger public audience, including many people who